Claude Code MCP: Fix the 2 Things That Kill Your Flow

Stop waiting 15 seconds for edits. Stop searching the same files over and over.

Tejas Bhakta
Tejas Bhakta
November 24, 202511 min read
Claude Code MCP: Fix the 2 Things That Kill Your Flow

You're building a login form in Claude Code. You ask it to add validation.

Claude thinks for 3 seconds. Generates the code. You wait 12 more seconds while it rewrites the entire 400-line component. Finally done.

15 minutes later, you've made 4 edits and tested each one.

This is every day with Claude Code.


The Two Flow Killers

1. You Wait Forever for Simple Edits

Claude Code rewrites your entire file even for one-line changes.

On a 300-line React component: 8-12 seconds. On a 800-line API file: 25+ seconds. On anything over 1000 lines: Claude often just hangs.

You asked for a two-line fix. You waited 15 seconds watching a spinner. Your train of thought is gone.

2. Claude Searches Slowly, One File at a Time

"Where do we handle authentication errors?"

Claude Code searches sequentially:

  1. Greps for "authError" → reads 3 files
  2. Doesn't find it, greps for "auth" → reads 8 more files
  3. Still searching, tries "handleAuth" → reads 5 more files
  4. Finally finds it in file 12

Each grep is a separate roundtrip. Each file read loads more irrelevant code into Claude's context. By the time it finds the answer, Claude's context is polluted with 16 files of noise.

You've waited 90 seconds. Claude is now distracted by irrelevant code. Your flow is broken.

The problem: serial search. Claude can only do one tool call at a time. It's like having one hand tied behind your back while searching through a library.


What Actually Fixes This

One MCP server that adds two sub-agents:

FastApply: Merges edits in 0.5 seconds instead of waiting 15 Warp-Grep: Parallel code search that explores 8 paths simultaneously

Each one solves a specific flow killer.


How FastApply Fixes Slow Edits

You ask Claude Code to add error handling to a function.

Without FastApply:

  • Claude generates the full file with changes
  • Streams 2,400 tokens at ~180 tok/sec
  • You wait 13 seconds
  • File gets replaced

With FastApply:

  • Claude generates just the changes
  • FastApply merges at 10,500 tok/sec
  • Done in 0.6 seconds
  • You stay in flow

Real measurement on Next.js app (500 edits):

File SizeClaude DefaultWith FastApplyWhat You Feel
200 lines8.2s0.4sInstant
500 lines14.7s0.8sFast enough
1000 lines38s (or timeout)1.3sUsable

The difference isn't just speed. It's whether you maintain flow or lose your thread completely.


How Warp-Grep Fixes Slow Search

The problem with Claude Code's search: it's serial.

Ask it to find authentication logic. It searches once, reads a file, searches again, reads another file. One tool call at a time. Each roundtrip adds 2-3 seconds of latency.

By turn 12, Claude has read 16 files of mostly-irrelevant code. Its context is polluted. It's slower and less accurate.

Warp-Grep does parallel search - like Cognition's SWE-grep that powers Devin.

Instead of one grep at a time, it runs 8 parallel tool calls per turn. Multiple greps, multiple file reads, glob searches - all happening simultaneously.

Example query: "Find where we validate user permissions"

Claude Code (serial search):

text

Context now contains: 16 files, 4,200 lines, 68% irrelevant

Warp-Grep (parallel search):

text

Returns: 3 files with specific line ranges. No pollution.

The difference:

  • 5.8x faster (4.9s vs 28s)
  • Context stays clean - only relevant files loaded
  • Higher accuracy - model isn't distracted by noise

This is how Cognition's Windsurf stays fast. They call it "Fast Context" and measured that it prevents "context pollution" - the phenomenon where irrelevant code degrades answer quality.

Now you have it in Claude Code.


Install (Takes 60 Seconds)

macOS: Add to ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json

Windows: Add to %APPDATA%/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json

json

Get API key: morphllm.com/dashboard/api-keys

Restart Claude Code completely (quit and reopen).

That's it. Ask Claude: "What MCP tools are available?" and you'll see the new tools.


A Real Workflow: Building a Feature Start to Finish

Let's say you're adding two-factor auth to an existing app.

How it feels with regular Claude Code:

You: "Add 2FA to the login flow"

Claude: generates code for LoginPage.tsx (14 seconds to apply)

You: "Where do we validate user credentials?"

Claude: searches, returns 40+ files

You: manually search for 6 minutes, find auth/validator.ts

You: "Update validator to check 2FA codes"

Claude: rewrites file (11 seconds)

You: debug for 10 minutes, find typo in API endpoint

You: "Fix the endpoint typo"

Claude: rewrites file again (9 seconds)

Total time: 32 minutes. You context-switched multiple times between Claude and manual grep.


Same task with Morph MCP:

You: "Add 2FA to the login flow"

Claude: generates frontend changes

FastApply: merges in 0.7 seconds

You: "Find where we validate credentials"

Warp-Grep: runs 8 parallel searches (grep patterns, file reads, glob searches) → 4.2 seconds

Returns: auth/validator.ts lines 45-89, middleware/auth.ts lines 12-34

Claude: reads those specific ranges, plans backend changes

FastApply: merges in 0.5 seconds

Total time: 6 minutes. Zero context switches. Claude's context stayed clean.

You stay in flow. You ship.


Why Parallel Search Actually Matters

Cognition (the team behind Devin and Windsurf) published their research on this. They found that context pollution kills agent performance.

Here's what happens with serial search:

  1. Claude searches for "auth"
  2. Reads auth/utils.ts - not quite right
  3. Searches for "validate"
  4. Reads validators/index.ts - also not it
  5. Searches for "permission"
  6. Reads middleware/permissions.ts - getting closer
  7. By now Claude's context has 3 irrelevant files

The problem: Those 3 irrelevant files are still in context. Claude now thinks about them when generating code. It might combine patterns from the wrong file. Or reference functions that don't exist in the right file.

Cognition measured this: polluting context is worse than missing some context. Because Claude can always search again for missing info, but it can't un-see the wrong info.

Parallel search avoids this:

  • Explores 8 paths at once in Turn 1
  • Narrows down to the right files in Turn 2
  • Returns only the relevant line ranges
  • Claude's context stays clean

Result: Faster search + higher accuracy + you stay in flow.

Cognition calls this the "flow window" - you have about 5 seconds before your brain context-switches. Every second of waiting increases the chance you break flow by 10%.

Parallel search keeps you under 5 seconds. Serial search breaks flow every time.


What Changes in Your Day-to-Day

Morning standup: "I'll add rate limiting to the API"

Before: 2 hours

  • Search for existing patterns: 8 minutes (serial search across files)
  • Waiting for edits: 2 minutes (8 files × 15s each)
  • Manual testing: 12 minutes
  • Context pollution slows Claude down: keeps suggesting wrong patterns

After: 28 minutes

  • Warp-Grep finds patterns in 5 seconds (parallel search)
  • FastApply merges 8 files in 6 seconds total
  • Context stays clean: Claude's suggestions stay accurate
  • You stay in flow

Afternoon code review: "Fix these 8 linting errors across 6 files"

Before: 15 minutes (waiting for Claude to rewrite each file)

After: 3 minutes (FastApply merges each fix in under a second)

The compound effect: You ship 2-3x more code per day. Not because you code faster. Because you wait less.


The Flow Window: Why Speed Matters

Cognition's research found something critical: you have ~5 seconds before you break flow.

They call it the "flow window". Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (the psychologist who defined "flow state") described it as "complete absorption in an activity."

Measured: Your P(breaking flow) increases geometrically by 10% every second you wait.

text

Once you break flow: check Slack, check email, scroll Twitter. Takes 5+ minutes to get back into it.

This is why sub-agents matter:

  • FastApply: 0.5s edits keep you under the flow window
  • Warp-Grep: 5s parallel search keeps you engaged

The goal isn't just "faster." It's keeping you in flow. One unbroken session where you ship 3x more because you never context-switched.


Configuration Options

Windows Install (Most Common Issue)

On Windows, use the full path format:

json

Common Windows issues:

  • Restart Claude Code completely (kill process in Task Manager)
  • Verify Node.js and npm are in PATH
  • Use double backslashes in paths

Edit-Only Mode

Just want fast edits, no search?

json

Only adds edit_file tool. Use this if you already have your own search setup.


Real Use Cases (With Actual Times)

Frontend: Building a Checkout Flow

Without sub-agents: 45 minutes

  • Wait for 3 component edits: 8min (3 × 14s each, plus thinking)
  • Find Stripe integration pattern: 6min (serial search through docs, utils, config)
  • Debug modal timing issue: 12min
  • Final test: 4min

With sub-agents: 18 minutes

  • FastApply 3 components: 2.1s total
  • Warp-Grep finds Stripe pattern: 4.8s (parallel search)
  • FastApply fix: 0.5s

You saved 27 minutes. More importantly: you never broke flow. No tab switching, no losing your train of thought.

Backend: Adding Auth to 6 Endpoints

Without sub-agents: 52 minutes

  • Search for auth middleware examples: 11min (reading through old PRs, grepping, checking docs)
  • Wait for 6 file edits: 9min (6 × 90s average)
  • Write curl tests: 8min
  • Debug middleware order bug: 18min (grep logs, search config, trial & error)
  • Retest: 6min

With sub-agents: 14 minutes

  • Warp-Grep finds middleware examples: 6.2s (searches patterns + reads + ranks in parallel)
  • FastApply 6 files: 4.8s total
  • Write curl tests: 8min (same, this is thinking time)
  • Warp-Grep finds middleware config: 3.1s
  • FastApply fix: 0.7s
  • Retest: 1min

38 minutes saved. Flow maintained. You're still thinking about the auth logic, not about where files are or why searches are slow.


What Doesn't Work (Yet)

FastApply:

  • Max file size: 128k input tokens (works on 98% of real files)
  • Needs // ... existing code ... markers from Claude's output
  • Won't write new code from scratch (that's Claude's job)

Warp-Grep:

  • Parallel search requires Morph API (not local-only yet)
  • Works best with specific queries from agent ("find auth middleware" not "what does this do?")
  • Needs ripgrep installed when using local provider

If you're working in these areas, you'll still hit the limits. But for 90% of coding tasks, you'll stay in flow.


Get Started

  1. Add MCP config to Claude Code
  2. Restart completely
  3. Ask Claude: "What MCP tools are available?"
  4. Try: "Edit login.tsx to add error handling"

FastApply merges it in 0.5s. You'll feel the difference immediately.

Get API keyFull MCP docsWarp-Grep docs

Pricing:

  • FastApply: $0.80 per 1M tokens
  • Warp-Grep: $0.40 per 1M tokens

Free tier: 100k tokens/month to try it.


The Pattern We're Seeing

Teams that ship fast use this architecture:

Claude/GPT-4: Strategy, planning, intent understanding FastApply: Code merging at 10,500 tok/sec Warp-Grep: Semantic search across codebases

One reasoning model. Two execution sub-agents.

30% faster end-to-end. 30% less context rot. 36x cheaper.

Same developer. Better tools. More joy.

That's the point.